Liveability is a set of criteria of what a place is like to live in, such as environmental quality, safety, access to shops and services and cultural activities, the conditions of a decent life for all inhabitants of cities and communities including their physical and mental well being. Today it means a 10 to 20 minute walk to services, schools and green spaces. Access to green spaces is becoming as essential as running water and insulated homes so it’s rapidly becoming a marketing ploy by marketers. Melbourne was voted one of the world’s most liveable cities, 7 years in a row. Why? It offers a cohesive and stable society, healthcare, education, and world-class infrastructure. All of which does make Melbourne a magnificent city in which to live and work when compared to other cities. One of the criteria is good transport infrastructure, try telling that to a Melbournian commuter who has to travel in from the urban fringe! The Global Liveability Index focuses on things that matter to expats working in global cities, not citizens. This is different to what is important to the average person living in Melbourne or any other global city - such as housing affordability, walkability, access to public transport and education, and even the number of bike paths. Auckland, in New Zealand, took the top spot in 2021, perhaps due to the city’s ability to contain the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic faster and could lift restrictions earlier, unlike others around the world. However, not everyone can enjoy the benefits of an expat, roughly one in four Māori in Aotearoa New Zealand living in the greater Auckland region, the ranking has little relevance to them. The New Zealand Treasury’s Living Standards Framework looks at a more robust liveability criteria: civic engagement and governance, cultural identity, environment, health, housing, income and consumption, jobs and earnings, knowledge and skills, time use, safety and security, social connections and subjective well-being. Yet when assessed on these criteria the reality of housing, employment, poverty and health the Māori rate poorly. These ranking maybe indicators but are very subjective.